Perbedaan Pengaruh Functional Strength Training dan Neuro Developmental Treatment pada Pasien Stroke dengan Gangguan Motorik Kasar Berdasarkan Parameter Gait Speed di RS. Rujukan Stroke Nasional Bukit Tinggi Tahun 2009
Abstract
Aim: to detect patient ability average result does movement motorik coarse (step speed usually and speed maximum) before and after done intervention functional strength training based on parameter gait speed and to detect patient ability average result does movement motorik coarse (step speed usually and speed maximum) before and after done intervention neuro-developmental treatment based on parameter gait speed, with to detect ability comparison influence in do movement motorik coarse (step speed usually and speed maximum) by using parameter gait speed in group at give intervention functional strength training and neuro-developmental treatment. at RS. Rujukan Stroke Nasional Bukit Tinggi in 2009. Method: this watchfulness has quation eksperimental to detects effectiveness influence before and after do intervention FST and NDT towards sufferer stroke with disturbance motorik coarse by using design pre - post. This watchfulness is done at hospital. Reference stroke tall hill national west Sumatra, time that need in this watchfulness is begun from June until July 2009. Population patient stroke with age between 50-70 year at take care of at RSUP tall hill commencing from June - July 2009 as much as 177 person. Sample population that fulfil standard criteria inclution and eksclution. Big sample appointeds with belief degree 90% and persisi (d) = 0,2 with total 17 person every intervention groups so that overall sample from intervention group FST and NDT, number 34 person. Result: happen average change in gait speed step usually (lb) before and after intervention FST as big as 6,59, indigoly p = 0,15(>0,1, in gait speed step maximum average change before and after intervention FST as big as 4,1, with value p = 0,36(>0,1) so from value p step usually and maximum demo not found difference that have a meaning between before and after in intervention 1. Value gait speed step usually after given intervention ndt got value p = 0,007 (< 0,1) and step maximum after given intervention ndt found value p = 0,016(<0,1) mean there difference that have a meaning for value gait speed before and after given intervention. Found difference that have a meaning value gait speed step usually and maximum step in intervention group 1 and 2 before and after do intervention.
Keywords: Functional Strength Training, Neuro Developmental Treatment, Gait SpeedFull Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ada, Louise., Dorsch, S., dan Canning, C.G, “Strengthening Interventions Increase Strength and Improve Activity After Stroke: a Systematic Reviewâ€, Aus-tralian Journal of Physiotherapy 52 , Sydbey, 2007.
Agranoff, Adam B., “Stroke Motor Impaire-ment. eMedicine Specialtiesâ€, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stroke, New York, 2008.
American Health Association, “Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attackâ€, The Stroke Association, stroke rehabilitation , englad, 2006.
Bale, Marte., Strand, Inger Liv., “Does Functional Strength Training of The Leg in Subacute Stroke Improve Physical Performance? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trialâ€, Clin Rehabil; 22; p.911-921, 2008.
Bohannon, Richard W., “Muscle Strength and Muscle Training After Stroke – A Review Articleâ€, J Rehabil Med ; 39: p.14–20, 2007.
Derek G. Kamper et al, “Weakness Is the Primary Contributor to Finger Impairment in Chronic Stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabilâ€, 87:1262-9, 2006.
Duncan, P.W., Zorowitz, R., Bates, B., et al., “Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guidelineâ€, Stroke. Vol.36 ; p.e100-e143, 2005.
Fischer, U., Arnold, M., Nedeltchev, K., “NIHSS Score and Arteriographic Findings in Acute Ischemic Strokeâ€, Vol. 36; p.2121-2125, 2005.
Hellstrom, K, “On Self-Efficacy and Balance after Strokeâ€, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis : Uppsala, 2002.
Huxham, F.E., Goldie, P.A. Patla, A.E. “Theoretical Considerations in Balance Assessmentâ€, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol.47; p.89-100, 2002.
Jonathan A, “Edlow: Biographie of diseaseâ€, Julie K. Silver, M.D, halaman 12-26, London, 2008.
Kollen, B., Kwakkel, G., Lindeman, E., “Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Review of Current Developments in Stroke Rehabilitation Research. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trialsâ€, Vol. 1 ; No. 1 ; p.75-80, 2006.
Langhammer, B., Stanghelle, J.K, “Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A Comparison of Two Different Approaches of Physiotherapy in Stroke Rehabilitation : a Randomized Controlled Studyâ€, Clin Rehabil. Vol.14 ; p.361–369, 2000.
Luke Carolyn, Karen J Dodd, Kim Brock, “Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following strokeâ€, Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 888-898, 2004.
Newman, Michael., “The Process of Recoveryâ€, After Hemiplegia. Stroke ; 3 ; p.702-710, 1972.
Oliveira, C.B.d., Medeiros, I.R.T.d., Ferreira, N.A., et al, “Balance Control in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: Main Tools for Evaluationâ€, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. Vol.45 ; No.8 ; p.1215-1226, 2008.
Olsen, TS., “Arm and Leg Paresis as Outcome Predictors in Stroke Rehabilitationâ€, Stroke, 21, p.247-251, 1990.
O’Sullivan, Susan B., Schmitz, Thomas J., “Physical Rehabilitationâ€, Edisi 5. F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, 2007.
Pollock, Alex., Baer, G., Langhorne, P., et al, “Physiotherapy Treatment Approaches for The Recovery of Postural Control and Lower Limb Function Following Stroke: a Systematic Reviewâ€, Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, p.395–410, 2007.
Salbach, N.M, “Gait Measure of Stroke Outcomeâ€, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Liv Inger Strand, Canada, 1997.
Sheikh, K., Brennan, P J., Meade, T W., et al., “Predictors of Mortality and Disability in Strokeâ€, J Epidemiol Community Health;37; p.70-74, 1983.
Sunardi, “Asuhan Keperawatan pada Tn.AM dengan Stroke Hemoragikâ€, RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, 2007.
Tyson, Sarah F., Hanley M., Chillala J., et al., â€Balance Disability After Strokeâ€, Physical Therapy, Vol 85 ; No 1 ; p.30-38, 2006.
Valery Feigin, “Panduan Bergambar Tentang Pencegahan dan Pemulihan trokeâ€, Gramedia, Jakarta, 2004.
Venketasubramanian, N., FAMS., “The Epidemiology of Stroke in ASEAN Countries – A Reviewâ€, Neurol J Southeast Asia 3, p.9-14, 1998.
Wang, Ray Yau., Chen, Hsiu-I., Chen, Chen-Yin., et al, “Efficacy of Bobath Versus Orthopaedic Approach on Impairment and Function at Different Motor Recovery Stages After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Studyâ€, Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol.19, Np.155- 164, 2005.
William, L.S., Yilmaz, E.Y., Lopez-Yunez, A.M., “Retrospective Assessment of Initial Stroke Severity With the NIH Stroke Scaleâ€, Stroke AHA. Vol.31 ; p.858-862, 2000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/fisio.v9i2.630
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.