Ni Luh Widyaningsih


Garbage is a classic public problem and almost happens in big cities and suburban areas. This phenomenon triggers other problems, such as increasing sources of disease spread; cause environmental pollution (soil, water and air); and lowering people's living standards. So far, the waste management paradigm has only focused on the final stage, namely at the stage of waste disposal. At present the paradigm must be changed because it sees a rapid increase in population and encourages an increase in public demand for the necessities of life. The increase in demand for goods and services will certainly increase the amount of waste generation that occurs every day. On the other hand, there was also a change in the paradigm of economic orientation from the side of the company's business activities due to a decrease in environmental quality from the amount of waste. The change of paradigm from the interest orientation to get profit for the shareholders becomes an interest that is more oriented to the environment and social (stakeholders). Corporate social responsibility or Corporate Social Responsibility to reduce municipal waste and help poor families get through the establishment of a waste bank. The research approach used was a qualitative approach using quantitative data, where socialization was carried out on the definition of household waste and also Focus Groups Discussion (FGD) with community leaders and environmental observers. It was concluded that the three related sectors namely economic, social and environmental would support development sustainable.


Keywords: corporate social responsibility, focus group discussion, waste management

Teks Lengkap:



Apriadji, Mutawakil, Sudrajat, Suryo, Armando, Rochim, Yuwono, dan Dipo. (2011). Penanganan dan Pengolahan Sampah. Penulis PS. Penerbit: Seri Industri Kecil.

Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production. (2010). United Nation Environment Programme.

Bastian, L. (2014). Municipal Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. National Council on Climate Change.

Bazela, M. (2011). Sustainable Consumption-Towards a New Economic Humanism. IF Press.

Dunlap, R.E, dan Marshall, B.K. (2006). Environment Sociology. -----

Enger, E. D., dan Smith, B. F. (2006) Environmental Science-A Study of Relationship. McGraw Hill International Edition.

Integrated Waste Management. (2013).

Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating Sustainable Consumption. A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behavior and Behavioral Change. Sustainable Development Research Network.

Markandya, A., Harou, P., Bellu, L., dan Vito, C. (2002). Environmental Economics for Sustainable Growth-A Handbook for Practitioners. Penerbit: Edward Elgar.

Marsh, K., dan Bugush, B. (2007). Food Packaging-Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues. (vol. 72, no. 3). Journal of Food Science.

Miller, T. G. (1991). Environmental Science. (3rd Edition). Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Miller, T. G. (1996). Explaining Keynes’s Theory of Consumption, and Assessing its Strengths and Weaknesses.

Miller, T. G., dan Spoolman, S. E. (2007). Living in the Environment. Brooks/Cole-Cengage Learning.

Modigliani, F. (1966). The Life Cycle Hypothesis of Saving, The Demand for Wealth and the Supply Capital. ProQuest Information and Learning Company.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Yeoh, BG. (2006). Municipal Solid Waste Generation and Composition. Asean Committee on Science and Technology, Sub Committee on Non Coventinoal Energy Research.

Zhu, H. (1996). Beginner Modeling Exercise-Section 3-Mental Semulation of Simple Negative Feedback. MIT System Dynamics in Education Project.


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.