ANALISA BIBLIOMETRIK VISUALISASI PUBLIKASI BIDANG ILMU KOMPUTER ERA PERIODE 2016 – 2020

Mohamad Iqbal, Nizirwan Anwar, Nugroho Budhisantosa

Sari


Analisis bibliometrik merupakan sebuah metode kuantitatif untuk menganalisisa dan memetakan based on metadata bibliograph) dan text, meng-clustering artikel ilmiah yang sesuai dengan suatu bidang keilmuan dan scope penelitian. Dalam melakukan dan memudahkan analisis bibliometrik diperlukan suatu perangkat lunak Publish or Perish  (PoP), pada alat bantu dapat menampilkan title paper, authors, publication, publisher, citation, rank, average (paper, citation, authors), dan tahun terbit. Basis data dalam melakukan pencarian digunakan yang bersumber dari crossref, google scholar dan scopus untuk langkah lanjutan  memasukkan, title words dan keywords. Pada penelitian dengan aplikasi PoP mengambil title word computer science dan internet of things untuk menampilkan pemetaan dan klusterisasi pada masing-masing kedua title diatas  mengambil sample data periode tahun 2016 – 2020 diperoleh data dari sumber crossref (1800 artikel), google scholar (1507 artikel), dan scopus (282 artikel), dengan setting default preferences 250 – 300. Rata-rata dalam periode tahun tersebut 2 title word, menghasilkan paper (179,42), citation (3014,08), cites/year (979,01), cites/paper (13.86), authors/paper (2.22), H-index (19,92) dan G-index (36,17). Langkah berikutnya melakukan visualisasi VOSviewer sehingga dapat menampilkan berdasarkan data jejaring dengan tipe data map based on bibliography asumsi threshold = 5, number of authors = 213 dengan metode fractional counting diperoleh 11 cluster area research dan metode full counting diperoleh 11 cluster area research. Bila menggunakan map based on text dengan asumsi threshold = 10, number of authors = 374 method binary counting diperoleh 7 cluster area research dan method full counting asumsi threshold = 10, number of authors = 419 diperoleh 9 cluster area research.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


M. Erfanmanesh and A. Abrizah, “Mapping worldwide research on the Internet of Things during 2011-2016,” Electron. Libr., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 979–992, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/EL-09-2017-0196.

R. H. Raja Mohd Ali, A. Ahmi, and S. Sudin, “Examining the trend of the research on the internet of things (IoT): A bibliometric analysis of the journal articles as indexed in the Scopus database,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1529, no. 2, p. 22075, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1529/2/022075.

N. Anwar et al., “Workshop Bibliometrik Menginterpretasikan ‘Clustering and Counting’ Metadata Publikasi Periode 2017 – 2022 (title words; ‘Internet of Things’),” J. Pengabdi. Masy. Bangsa, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 43–55, 2023, doi: 10.59837/jpmba.v1i3.34.

N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

A. Velásquez-Durán and M. S. Ramírez Montoya, “Research management systems: Systematic mapping of literature (2007-2017),” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 44–55, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.8.1.3307.

M. J. Cobo, B. Jürgens, V. Herrero-Solana, M. A. Martínez, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Industry 4.0: A perspective based on bibliometric analysis,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 139, pp. 364–371, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.278.

A. M. Aragon, “A measure for the impact of research,” Sci. Rep., vol. 3, no. 1, 2013, doi: 10.1038/srep01649.

O. Ellegaard and J. A. Wallin, “The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?,” Scientometrics, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1809–1831, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.

J. M. Merigó and J. B. Yang, “A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 73, pp. 37–48, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004.

D. Yu, Z. Xu, and W. Pedrycz, “Bibliometric analysis of rough sets research,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 94, p. 106467, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106467.

N. J. V. Eck and L. Waltman, “Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.17,” Univeristeit Leiden CWTS Meaningful metrics 22 july, no. July, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf.

L. Waltman, N. J. van Eck, and E. C. M. Noyons, “A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks,” J. Informetr., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 629–635, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.

R. E. Day, “Documents from head to Toe: Bodies of knowledge in the works of Paul Otlet and Georges Bataille,” Libr. Trends, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 395–408, 2018, doi: 10.1353/lib.2018.0009.

D. Fiala and G. Tutoky, “Computer science papers in web of science: A bibliometric analysis,” Publications, vol. 5, no. 4. 2017. doi: 10.3390/publications5040023.

J. Chavda and A. Patel, “Measuring research impact: Bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP,” Br. J. Gen. Pract., vol. 66, no. 642, pp. e59–e61, 2016, doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683353.

K. Allegaert, K. De Coen, and H. Devlieger, “Threshold retinopathy at threshold of viability: The EpiBel study,” Br. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 2004, doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.027474.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/komp.v9i01.8590

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


VISITOR COUNTER:

gerEGGe

 

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter View My Stats