Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Lex Jurnalica accommodates articles or writings from the results of thoughts in the field of legal development, legal opinion, or also research in the field of law, such as criminal law, civil law, economic and business law, constitutional law, international law, sociology of law and other fields of law. The primary audiences are academicians, graduate students, practitioners, and others interested in law. Lex Jurnalica is published three times in one year

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Blind Peer Review Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month (four week) for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects.

These guidelines will help you understand your responsibilities as a reviewer, as well as your ethical obligations to both the journal and the authors. You will also be introduced to what you should be looking for in a manuscript, so that your review will be consistent with others requested by the journal.

Articles received will be examined for the existence of elements plagiarism by using Turnitin program

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

Lex Jurnalica is a peer-reviewed journal published by Universitas Esa Unggul with e-ISSN 2528-3251 and p-ISSN 1858-0262. This statement clarifies  ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of an article in this journal, including the auditor, the editor-in chief, the Editorial Board, the peer reviewer, and the publisher.  

Authors

  1. The author ensures that the material to be published have not been published and sent to another place simultaneously
  2. Authors must ensure the authenticity of their research and they have cited the others opinion correctly in accordance with the reference format.
  3. The author is not involved in plagiarism.
  4. Authors must follow the Lex Jurnalica writing guideline
  5. The contents of the writing are entirely the responsibility of the author.

 Editors

  1. Editors should be responsible for every article published in Lex Jurnalica.
  2. Editors should help authors to follow the guidelines for author.
  3. Editors may communicate with other editors or reviewers in making the final decision.
  4. An editor has to evaluate the manuscript objectively for publication, judging each on its quality without looking to nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors. Editors should decline the assignment when there is a potential for conflict of interest.
  5. Editors need to ensure the document sent to the reviewers does not contain the information of the author, vice versa.
  6. Editors’ decision should be informed to authors accompanied by reviewers’ comments unless they contain offensive or libelous remarks.
  7. Editors should respect requests from authors that an individual should not review the submission if these are well reasoned and practicable.
  8. Editors and all staffs should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript.

Reviewers

  1. Reviewers commented on the possibility of errors in ethical research and publications.
  2. Reviewers should do the job on time and notify the Editor if they can not finish the job.
  3. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript.
  4. Reviewers should not be receiving and reviewing the manuscript if there is a potential conflict of interest between them and the authors.