PLUSES AND MINUSES FOR INDONESIA IN DECIDING WHETHER TO RATIFY THE MADRID PROTOCOL CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARK

Nin Yasmine Lisasih

Abstract


Abstract

This research examines the issues related to the ratify the Madrid Protocol concerning the International registration of trade mark. This research will examines how the impact of ratification of Madrid System would not only for Indonesian IP consultants, but also the income of the state would be lost if Indonesia joint with the Madrid System. The phenomenon above has risen some questions as to whether the system of international registration marks should be adopted by Indonesia or not. This paper tries to analyze and identify the inter national registration system based on Madrid Agreement and the Protocol, including their problems related to their implementation in Indonesia. The methodology is normative juridical of which the result of this research are the problem is not regulated whilst there are some cases reported. The result showed that ratifying international trademark registration Madrid Protocol has advantages and disadvantages for Indonesia. Based on the above discussion, basically Madrid Protocol to increase the competitiveness of the nation but need careful preparation for the run. Necessary steps to be prepared by a mature Indonesian government before joining the Madrid Protocol.

 

Keywords: madrid protocol, trade mark, ratification

 

AbstrakPenelitian ini meneliti masalah-masalah yang berkaitan dengan ratifikasi Protokol Madrid mengenai pendaftaran merek dagang Internasional. Penelitian ini akan mengkaji bagaimana dampak ratifikasi Sistem Madrid tidak hanya untuk konsultan IP Indonesia, tetapi juga pendapatan negara akan hilang jika Indonesia bergabung dengan Sistem Madrid. Fenomena di atas telah menimbulkan beberapa pertanyaan, apakah sistem tanda pendaftaran internasional harus diadopsi oleh Indonesia atau tidak. Makalah ini mencoba menganalisis dan mengidentifikasi sistem registrasi antar nasional berdasarkan Perjanjian Madrid dan Protokol, termasuk masalah mereka terkait dengan implementasinya di Indonesia. Metodologi ini adalah yuridis normatif dimana hasil penelitian ini adalah masalahnya tidak diatur sementara ada beberapa kasus yang dilaporkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meratifikasi pendaftaran merek internasional Protokol Madrid memiliki kelebihan dan kekurangan untuk Indonesia. Berdasarkan pembahasan di atas, pada dasarnya Protokol Madrid untuk meningkatkan daya saing bangsa tetapi perlu persiapan yang matang untuk menjalankannya. Langkah-langkah yang perlu disiapkan oleh pemerintah Indonesia yang matang sebelum bergabung dengan Protokol Madrid. Kata kunci: protokol madrid, merek dagang, ratifikas

References


Colorado Lawyer. (2003). “A Brand New World: International Trademark Registration And The Madrid Potocolâ€, 32-OCT Colo. Law, 89.

Decree of the Minister of Trade No. 1458/Kp/XII/84 On Trade Business License, dated December 19, 1984.

Government Regulation Number 2 of 2005 and Precidential Regulation Number 84 of 2006 about the legality of IP consultant

Keith E. Maskus. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights And Economic Development, Prepared for the series “Beyond the Treaties: A Symposium on Compliance with International Intellectual Property Lawâ€, organized by Fredrick K. Cox International Law Center at Case Western Reserve University. February 6, 2000

Law No. 13 of 1997 on the Amendment to Law Number 6 Year 1987 About Patents

Law No. 14 of 1997 on the Amendment aatas Act No. 19 of 1992 About Brand.

Law Number 12 of 1997 on the Amendment to Law No. 7 of 1987 About Copyright

Muhammad Djumhana and R. Djubaedillah. (2003). Hak Milik Intelektual, Sejarah, Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Presidential Decree No. 15 Year 1997 on Ratification of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization;

Presidential Decree No. 16 Year 1997 on Ratification of the Patent Cooperation Treaty and Regulations under the PCT;

Presidential Decree No. 17 Year 1997 on Pengesahaan The Trade Marks Law Treaty;

Presidential Decree No. 18 Year 1997 on Pengesahaan Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works;

Presidential Decree No. 19 Year 1997 on Ratification of the WIPO Copyrights Treaty.

Soerdjono Soekamto and Sri Mamudji. (1985). Penelitian Hukum Normatif suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Pengantar, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.

Sunaryati Hartono. (1994). Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia pada Akhir Abad ke-20, Alumni, Bandung.

WIPO. (1988). Background Reading Material On Intellectual Property, WIPO Publication, Geneva.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v16i1.2647

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul
Jalan Arjuna Utara No 9 Kebon Jeruk Jakarta 11510
Telp : 021 5674223 ext 266

email : [email protected]

    




Visitor Statistic