LEGAL PROTECTION OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION OF KASONGAN POTTERY CRAFT IN BANTUL, SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA AS A LOCAL POTENTIAL REGION

Dyah Permata Budi Asri, Sri Pramudya Wardhani

Abstract


Kasongan pottery handicrafts from Bantul, Yogyakarta has the potential to obtain legal protection as a Geographical Indication. This study analyzed the urgency of Kasongan Pottery Crafts to get legal protection as a Geographical Indication of Bantul. The approach using in this research is empirical juridical. Kasongan Village, Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta Special Province became the location of research in this study. Data collection methods are done through library research studies and field studies. The analysis method starts with data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Kasongan pottery craft needs legal protection as a Geographical Indication because economically, Kasongan pottery craft has great influence because most of the Kasongan Bantul people are supported by Kasongan pottery, and most of the Kasongan people are pottery craftsmen. Juridically, Kasongan pottery craft has different characteristics from earthenware products from other regions. It also has a good reputation, and its existence is still maintained to date. Therefore, it requires legal protection as a Geographical Indication and can be communally owned by the Kasongan Bantul community

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ai Tashiro, Yuta Uchiyama, and Ryo Kohsaka, (2018) Internal Processes of Geographical Indication and Their Effects: An Evaluation Framework for Geographical Indication Applicants in Japan, JEF

Miranda Risang Ayu, (2006), Memperbincangkan Hak kekayaan Intelektual Indikasi Geografis, PT.Alumni, Bandung, p. 31

SP. Gustami, Saptoto, and Narno S., (1985), Pola Hidup dan Produk Kerajinan Keramik Kasongan Yogyakarta, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Proyek Penelitian dan Pengkajian Budaya, Yogyakarta

Valente, M. E. R., Perez, R., & Fernandes, L. R. R. de M. (2013), The process of recognizing geographical indications for Brazilian food and beverages: regulation of use, delimitation of the area and differentiation of geographical indications

Journals:

Asri, D. P. B., Sriyono, E., Hapsari, M. A., & Syahrin, S. A. (2022), “Valuing local heritage: Issue and challenges of geographical indication protection for local artisans in Indonesia Kasongan village heritage” The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 25, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12206

Asri, D.P.B., (2023), “Pendampingan Permohonan Pengajuan Indikasi Geografis Kopi Robusta Merapi Sleman Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal (KIK)”, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Senantias, Universitas Pamulang, Vol.4 No. 1

Asri, D.P.B, Edy Sriyono, (2023), “Pengembangan Potensi Lokal Daerah Melalui Pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis Untuk Memperkuat Potensi Ekonomi Masyarakat di DI Yogyakarta”, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat, Vol. 3, No. 1, Universitas Nahdhatul Ulama Surabaya

Candra Irawan, (2017), “Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Perspective on Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia” (2017) JWIP

Castro, V. A., & Giraldi, J. de M. E., (2015). “Brand Strategies for Brazilian Sectors: an analysis of the conceptual differences between Geographical Indication, Collective Brand and Sectoral Brand. In Anais do VII Encontro de Estudos em Estratégia”. pp. 1-17. Brasília: ANPAD.

Christophe Geiger Daniel Gervais Norbert Olszak Vincent Ruzek, (2010), “Towards a Flexible International Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications”, The WIPO Journal, Analysis of Intelectual Property Issues, Volume 1 Issue 2, p. 147

Fadilah H. Arief,(2016), “Indonesian Crafts: The Overlooked Potential of Geographical Indication”, International Journal of Culture and History, Vol. 2, No. 3, September, p. 87

Filippo Arfini and others, (2019), “Are Geographical Indication Products Fostering Public Goods? Some Evidence from Europe” 11(2) Sustainability

Giang Hoang and others, (2020), ”The Impact of Geographical Indications on Sustainable Rural Development: A Case Study of the Vietnamese Cao Phong Orange” 12(11) Sustainability

Kal Raustiala and Stephen R. Munzer, (2007), “The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications”, The European Journal of International Law Vol. 18 no. 2 © EJIL, p. 343

Soumya Vinayan, (2017), “Geographical Indications in India: Issues and Challenges—An Overview” 20 JWIP 3

Tri Winarno, (2016), “Perbandingan Karakteristik Lempung Kasongan dan Godean Sebagai Bahan Baku Industri Gerabah Kasongan”, Jurnal Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Vol 37 No 1, p. 45

Skripsi/Tesis/Disertasi

SP. Gustami, (1988), Seni Kerajinan Keramik Kasongan Yogyakarta: Kontinuitas dan Perubahannya (Tesis sebagai syarat untuk mencapai derajat Sarjana S-2 pada Program Studi Pengkajian Seni Pertunjukan dan Seni Rupa, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta), p/ 2-6.

Timbul Raharjo, (2008), Seni Kerajinan Keramik Kasongan Yogyakarta di Era Globalisasi: Perjalanan Dari Dusun Gerabah Menjadi Sentra Seni Kerajinan Keramik yang Mendunia, (Disertasi Program Studi Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta), p. 4

Internet Source:

About Geographic Indications, available at: www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/about_geographical_ind.html (last visited 20 Nov. 2006). O’Connor argues that a GI ‘ is linked . . . to something more than mere human creativity including topography, climate, or other factors independent from human creativity ’ : O’Connor, supra note 6, at 113, diakses 7 November 2023




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v20i3.7317

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul
Jalan Arjuna Utara No 9 Kebon Jeruk Jakarta 11510
Telp : 021 5674223 ext 266

email : [email protected]

    




Visitor Statistic