Yohanes Budiarto


The purpose of this study was to confirm the factors of Religious Scheme Scale (RSS) using Indonesian Christian student sample. Participants were 230 students (male n= 100, female = 130) with age ranged from 15 – 23 years old (M = 16.8, SD = 1.588). Factor Analysis using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted using AMOS 21 did not confirm the 15 – item 3 – factor as proposed by Streib et al. (2010) but 13 – item 3 factor model. The unsatisfactory 2 variables were found in xenosophia sub scale. This study was considered similar to Proios’ study (2015) in Greece which dropped 2 items from xenosophia sub scale. The predictive validity of RSS showed a good predictor of identity fusion. In conclusion, RSS is satisfactory to be implemented in Indonesian Christian student samples.


Keyword: Religious Scheme Scale, Factor analysis, Indonesian Christian students sample, predictive validity, identity fusion

Teks Lengkap:



Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.

Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2005). Fundamentalism and authoritarianism. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park(Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 378–393). New York: Guilford.

Emerson, M.O. and Hartman, D. (2006). The rise of religious fundamentalism.Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2006. 32:127–44doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123141.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: IntroducingStatistical Method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.

Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith. The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. San Francisco,CA: Harper & Row.

Ghozali, I. (2008), Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program Amos 16.0, Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Gomez, A ., Brooks, M. L., Buhrmester, M. D., Va´zquez, A., Jetten, J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 918–933. doi:10.1037/a0022642

Hair, J.F., Tatham, R.L., Anderson, R.E. and Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. (5thed.) London : Prentice-Hall.

Jackson, D.L., Stephenson, R.P. and Gillapsy, J.A. (2009). Reporting Practices in Conï¬rmatory Factor Analysis:An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychological MethodsVol. 14, No. 1, 6–23. DOI: 10.1037/a0014694.

McIntosh, D. N. (1995). Religion-as-schema, with implications for the relation between religion and coping. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 5, 1–16.

Proios, M., (2015). Structure Validity of the Religious Schema Scale in Greek.Journal of Social Science Studies.Vol. 2, No. 1

Streib, H., Hood, R. W., & Klein, C. (2010). The Religious Schema Scale: Construction andInitial Validation of a Quantitative Measure for Religious Styles. The International

Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 151-172. doi:10.1080/10508619.2010.481223

Swan, W.B., Gomez, A., Seyle, D.C., Morales, F.J., and Huici, J. (2009). Identity Fusion: The Interplay of Personal and Social Identities in Extreme Group Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009, Vol. 96, No. 5, 995–1011


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.