Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Eduscience : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan with registered number ISSN 2460-7770 (print) and ISSN 2502-3241 (online)  is a journal for all of researches in science education field which is published by Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul. Eduscience will support science education researches that focus on curriculum of science education included its policy and regulation, science teaching and learning in the school settings in the context of early childhood to university education, and development of pre-service and in-service science teacher. It can be a home to share any ideas, opinion, finding, and condition views of implementation theoretical and conceptual framework of science education in its school settings. Eduscience journal publishes twice a year in February and August.

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the peer reviewer and will go to the next selection. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month (four week) for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects.

All papers submitted to Eduscience undergo a rigorous peer-review to ensure that they not only fit into the journal's scope but are of sufficient academic quality and novelty to appeal to our readers. As a reviewer, you will be required to uphold this standard.

These guidelines will help you understand your responsibilities as a reviewer, as well as your ethical obligations to both the journal and the authors. You will also be introduced to what you should be looking for in a manuscript, so that your review will be consistent with others requested by the journal.

 

Publication Ethics

Eduscience: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan using guidelines issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics (Commission of Publication Ethics/ COPE). Ethical publication should be clear in order to improve the quality of research.  Eduscience’s COPE adjust to meet the ethical standards both for publishers, authors, editors and reviewers.

Here are the ethical standards for authors, editors and reviewers.

Authors

  1. The author ensures that the material to be published have not been published and sent to another place simultaneously
  2. Authors must ensure the authenticity of their research and they have cited the others opinion correctly in accordance with the reference format.
  3. The author is not involved in plagiarism.
  4. Authors must follow the criteria described in the guideline writing to the author of Eduscience Journal.
  5. Authors are not advised to publish any personal information that may make the patient recognizable identity in the form of the description section, photograph or genealogy. When photographs of patients are very important and indispensable as scientific information, the authors have received approval in written form and has clearly stated it.
  6. Authors must submit the data and details to the editor, if suspected falsification or fabrication of data.
  7. The authors should explain everything that can give rise to a conflict of interest such as employment, research costs, consulting fees, and intellectual property on guidelines for Eduscience’s writers

Editors

  1. Editors should be responsible for every article published in Eduscience.
  2. Editors should help authors to follow the guidelines for author.
  3. Editors may communicate with other editors or reviewers in making the final decision.
  4. An editor has to evaluate the manuscript objectively for publication, judging each on its quality without looking to nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors. Editors should decline the assignment when there is a potential for conflict of interest.
  5. Editors need to ensure the document sent to the reviewers does not contain the information of the author, vice versa.
  6. Editors’ decision should be informed to authors accompanied by reviewers’ comments unless they contain offensive or libelous remarks.
  7. Editors should respect requests from authors that an individual should not review the submission if these are well reasoned and practicable.
  8. Editors and all staffs should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript.
  9. Editors will be guided by the COPE flowcharts if there is a suspected misconduct or disputed authorship.

Reviewers

  1. Reviewers commented on the possibility of errors in ethical research and publications.
  2. Reviewers should do the job on time and notify the Editor if they can not finish the job.
  3. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript.
Reviewers should not be receiving and reviewing the manuscript if there is a potential conflict of interest between them and the authors