EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN IPA MENGGUNAKAN PETA KONSEP SEBAGAI CONSOLIDATION PHASE BERBASIS STAD TERHADAP KREATIVITAS SISWA DALAM MATERI POLUSI LINGKUNGAN

Oktian Fajar Nugroho

Abstract


Abstract

This research aimed to develop student’s creativity in mind map usage as a STAD based Consolidation base. The research used a randomized control group pretest-posttest, true experiment method. Random Cluster Sampling technic was used to collect data from student creativity test, questionnaire, and rubric. The results showed the positive development of student creativity. It can be concluded that mind map as a STAD based Consolidation Phase develops students creativity.             

 

Keywords: mind map, consolidation phase, stad            

 

Abstrak

Tujuan dalam penelitian ini untuk meningkatkan kreativitas siswa dalam penggunaan peta konsep sebagai consolidation phase berbasis STAD. Penelitian ini menggunakan randomized control group pretest-posttest. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode True Experiment. Dengan sample penelitian dilakukan dengan teknik randon cluster sampling. Data penelitian diperoleh dari test krevitas siswa, kuesioner, dan rubrik. Hasil peneltian menunjukkan hasil yang positif terhadap peningkatan kreativitas siswa. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa peta konsep sebagai consolidation phase berbasis STAD meningkatkan kreativitas siswa.

 

Kata kunci:  peta konsep, consolidation phase, stad


References


Daftar Pustaka

Amadieu, F, at all. (2009). Effect of Prior Knowledge and Concept Map Structure on Disorientation, Cognitive Load, and Learning, Learning and Instruction 19, 376-386 DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.005

Anderson, O. W., Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman

Arifin, Z. (2009). EvaluasiPembelajaran. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). ProsedurPenelitian. Jakarta: PT RinekaCipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar-dasarEvaluasiPendidikan. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Chiou, C.C. (2008). The Effect of Concept Mapping on Students’ Learning Achievements and Interests.Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 45 (4), 375-387.

Conradty, C & Bogner, F. X. (2012). Knowledge Presented in Concept Maps:Correlation with Conventional Cognitive Knowledge Test, Educational Studies, 38(3), 341-354 DOI: org/10.1080/03055698.2011.643100

Dahaka, A. (2012). Concept Mapping : Effective Tool in Biology Teaching.Technical and Non- Technical Internatiional Journal. 3 (6), 225-230.

Gerstner, S & Bogner, F. X. (2009). Cognitive Achievement and Motivation in Hands on and Teacher Centred Science Classes: Doesn an additional hands on consolidation phase (concept mapping) optimise cognitive learning at work stations?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 849-870, doi: 10.1080/09500690902803604

Lalor, S.B. (2014). The Effects of Using Concept Mapping for Improving Advanced Level Biology Students’ Lower and High Order Cognitive Skill, International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 839-864, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.829255

Lian, M. W. S., (2009). An Investigation into High Achiever and Low Achiever Knowledge Organisation and Knowledge Processing in Concept Mapping: A Case Study, Reserach in Science Education, 39(3), 337-352 DOI: org/10.1080/03055698.2009.643100

Martinez, G et al. (2012). The Effectiveness of Concept Maps in Teaching Physics Concepts Applied to Engineering Education: Experimental Comparison of the Amount of Learning Achieved With and Without Concept Maps, Journal Science Educatuion Technology, 22, 204-214 DOI: 10.1007/s10956-012-9386-8

McNamara, J., Larkin, I. And Beatson, A. (2009) Using poster presentation as assessment of work integrated learning, 29 September – 1 October 2010, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.

Munandar, Utami: S.C. (2002). Strategi Mewujudkan Potensi Kreatif dan Bakat, Jakarta: PT Gramedia

Munandar, Utami; S.C. (1992). Mengembangkan Bahan dan Kreatifitas Anak Sekolah (petunjukbagi para guru dan orang tua), Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Novak, J. D., &Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Piá, A.B., Blasco-Tamarit, E., & Muñoz-Portero, M.J. (2011). Different applications of concept maps in Higher Education.Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(1), 81-102.

Purwanto, M. N. (2009). Prinsip-PrinsipdanTeknikEvalusasiPengajaran, Bandung: Rosdakarya

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang memperngaruhi. Jakarta: PT AsdiMahasatya

Stewart, M. (2012). Joined Up Thinking? Evaluating the Use of Concept Mapping to Develope Complex System Learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 349-368 DOI: org/ 10.1080/02602938.2010.534764

Sugiyono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tavares R. (2010). Concept Map Under Modified Bloom Taxonomy Analysis. Concept Maps: Making Learning Meaningful. 34-39. [Online]. Retrieved from http://cmc.ihmc.us/.[Accessed on May31, 2015].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats